Research & Scientific References
The science behind Decarbonr
🔬 Science-Backed Data
Decarbonr uses data from peer-reviewed scientific research and leading climate institutions. Our carbon footprint calculations are based on the most comprehensive and up-to-date studies available.
All emission factors and sustainable targets are derived from authoritative sources including the IPCC, European Environment Agency, and the most cited food emissions study by Poore & Nemecek (2018).
Primary Research Sources
Poore & Nemecek (2018) - Science
"Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers"
Key findings:
- Analysis of ~38,000 farms across 119 countries
- Covers 40 food products representing 90% of global protein and calorie consumption
- Most comprehensive study of food production's environmental impacts
- Shows dramatic differences in emissions between food types
CarbonNerd - Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST)
Educational platform for carbon footprint awareness
Resources:
- Country-specific carbon footprint data
- Educational materials on climate change
- Interactive carbon calculators
- Research-backed sustainability recommendations
Our World in Data - University of Oxford
Comprehensive environmental and climate statistics
Data provided:
- Country-level CO₂ emissions per capita
- Food production environmental impacts
- Historical climate data and trends
- Sustainable development indicators
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Official environmental data for European Union
Travel emission factors:
- Airplane: 255g CO₂e per km (including radiative forcing)
- Car (diesel): 192g CO₂e per km
- Bus: 105g CO₂e per km
- Train: 41g CO₂e per km
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
United Nations body for assessing climate change science
Key contributions:
- Paris Agreement 2°C target framework
- Global carbon budget recommendations
- Climate change mitigation pathways
- 2 tonnes CO₂e/year sustainable target derivation
Additional Scientific Articles
Environmental impacts of food production and consumption
Clune et al. (2017) - Journal of Cleaner Production
Read Article →Carbon footprints of 13,000 cities
Moran et al. (2018) - Environmental Research Letters
Read Article →Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change
Springmann et al. (2016) - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Read Article →The greenhouse gas emissions of various dietary practices
Scarborough et al. (2014) - Climatic Change
Read Article →Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of beef cattle
Rotz et al. (2019) - Journal of Animal Science
Read Article →Emission Factors Used in the App
🍽️ Food Emissions (per 100g)
| Food Item | CO₂e (grams) | Category |
|---|---|---|
| Beef | 2,990 | Very High |
| Lamb | 2,420 | Very High |
| Cheese | 1,350 | High |
| Pork | 1,220 | High |
| Chicken | 620 | Medium |
| Fish | 550 | Medium |
| Eggs | 450 | Medium |
| Milk | 320 | Low |
| Tofu | 200 | Very Low |
| Beans | 100 | Very Low |
| Vegetables | 50 | Very Low |
🚗 Travel Emissions (per km)
| Transport Type | CO₂e (g/km) | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| ✈️ Airplane | 255 | Very High |
| 🚗 Car (diesel) | 192 | High |
| 🚌 Bus | 105 | Medium |
| 🚆 Train | 41 | Low |
| 🚲 Bicycle | 0 | Zero |
| 🚶 Walking | 0 | Zero |
⚠️ Important Disclaimer
The carbon footprint data in this app is for educational and awareness purposes. While based on peer-reviewed scientific research, all calculations are estimates and may vary based on numerous factors including:
- Production methods and farming practices
- Transportation distances and methods
- Processing and packaging
- Seasonal variations
- Regional differences
This app does not provide professional environmental, nutritional, or dietary advice. Always consult with qualified professionals for personalized recommendations.